You might be aware of the long-running debate known as Mac vs. PC (personified by Justin Long + John Hodgman on the humorous "I'm a Mac" commercials). And you may be aware that there's a debate whether XP isn't a better OS than Vista. And, you may be aware that there's a free OS, known as Linux, which has a few proponents who claim theirs is the best.
Which one's the best? There's an awful lot of opinions out there (and if you agree with mine, you're really smart!), but has anyone every done a true, impartial test to determine which one really is the safest/fastest/most features/cost-effective/easy-to-use operating system today? Well yes, someone has-- and the latest comes from PC Magazine's March issue.
[Yes, PCMag has long been accused of being a Microsoft puppet and/or shill. Look at the name, though: it's "PC", not "Mac Magazine" (and, yes, there's one of those, too). But how do you write about personal computers and NOT write about Microsoft? Hmm?]
The article compares Mac OS 10.5.1 (the latest "Leopard"), Windows XP SP2, Vista, and Ubuntu 7.10 , and it compares them in these areas:
*Price
*Installation (ease)
*GUI (the graphical 'look')
*Bundled Software
*3rd Party Software
*Drivers/Hardware
*Networking
*Security
As you might expect, each OS won some categories, and lost in others; for example, Ubuntu is free, so it will clearly win the Price category, and since it doesn't have a huge budget for graphic artists (and Linux folk aren't afraid of the command line) it loses the GUI category. To see the results chart, click here.
The scores in each category were totaled to produce a winner, and the "Microsoft shill", PC Magazine, proclaims Leopard the winner. (And, perhaps more interestingly, XP and Vista tied.)
My two cents: There are a few flaws in this comparison 'test' that shouldn't be overlooked.
*Vista was tested before Service Pack 1
*The first three categories are largely non-factors: Price and Installation are largely irrelevant to most people. Most people buy a new computer, not an OS Install CD/DVD. And a GUI is a GUI-- how pretty it looks has nothing to do with your computer's operation.
I believe the most important factors are Security and 3rd Party Software.. followed by Drivers/Hardware.
In Security: Leopard wins.. not because its armor plating is more bulletproof, but because less than 3% of the worlds computers are running it and so hackers ignore it.
In Drivers/Hardware: XP SP2 wins.. but time will move Vista ahead as more drivers get written and pass MS's WHQL.
In the all-important 3rd-Party Software category: XP SP2 wins.. but again, time will move Vista into the lead.
So clearly PC Magazine is wrong. XP SP2 is the better OS.. for now.
How can I say that? Games, baby. Games. There aren't any for Macs.
And of course.. other programs. Walk into a store that sells software some time and look at the size of the Mac section and then the size of the PC titles. That tells you all you need to know.
OS's and you: But which one is best for YOU? I agree totally with the author of the article in PC Mag (Eric Griffith): it depends on what you use your computer for.
If all you do is surf the Web, and you're on a budget, Ubuntu is probably your best choice. If you're a cutting-edge gamer, you probably will have to struggle with Vista for Direct X 10 titles. If you're a network admin.. Red Hat is probably your OS (are you ready for Server 2008?).
But the fact remains, the OS you use will be the one that came with your computer. And as I mentioned in "Mac Myths", which brand you decide to buy will probably be decided by which 'camp' you joined.. way back in the early days.
Copyright 2007-8 © Tech Paul. All rights reserved.
| Share this post : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
No comments:
Post a Comment